The ATCA Forum

Hi,

I used:
But prthd shows that the object name is still unmodified. Why?

Thank you!

ste616 wrote:Hi Boyang,

No, I mean the ouput of uvspec, with vis=1934-638, stokes=xx,yy options=nopass,nopol,nocal, axis=chan,phase and yrange=-180,180.

Hi Jamie, you're right. The channels > 4500 are bad, after flagging all the channels > 4500, it looks as normal as it should be~!

Hi Boyang, This looks to me like you have not set your delays correctly, which also affects the Tsys measurements. What do your phases look like over your channel range while observing 1934-638? Thank you Jamie! Do you mean these plots? 1934-638_170427_time,phase.png 1934-638_170427_phase,amp.png

Hi~ In c3086 we were using 6a array to observe the 21cm absorption lines towards LMC/SMC. Some sources were observed in more than one day. 0540-6718, for example, was observed in 161123, 170419, 170426, 170427 and 170430. While in 3 of these 5 days, the amplitude of sources looks to be separated to ...

Hi Jamie, It seems that the fwhm & pa can only be printed on the screen? Can they also be output to some variables so that enabling coding with imfit? Thank you! Hi Andrew, What are the pixel dimensions of the dirty beam image that you are using? A possible way of getting around this limitation ...