Search found 215 matches

by ste616
Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:12 am
Forum: Imaging
Topic: Mosaic tile edges
Replies: 5
Views: 11831

Re: Mosaic tile edges

Hi Kingsley,

Can you please provide us an example of what you mean by "square tile edges"? I am afraid I don't know what you're referring to.
by ste616
Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:50 pm
Forum: Calibration
Topic: 15mm calibration question
Replies: 4
Views: 8103

Re: 15mm calibration question

Hi Tim, Great! Just for clarity, in the case of 1934 as my phase calibrator I would still gpcopy the 'flux correct' 0534 to it and proceed as normal (ie. gpcal then gpcopy to science source)? Yes. Will do. One thought I had was to increase the number of nfbin's used throughout the reduction. Using 2...
by ste616
Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:02 pm
Forum: Calibration
Topic: 15mm calibration question
Replies: 4
Views: 8103

Re: 15mm calibration question

Hi Tim, It sounds like you've nailed the process exactly how I would have done it. Once you've done the uvfmeas and recalibration stage, 0537-441 becomes a flux density calibrator just like 1934-638 is. Let us know how you go. If you run into trouble, there are some things in the process you may be ...
by ste616
Thu Dec 03, 2015 7:24 am
Forum: MIRIAD
Topic: Memory size issue with INVERT?
Replies: 3
Views: 3214

Re: Memory size issue with INVERT?

Hi Craig,

Why are you trying to image larger than the beam in a mosaic? That's what the mosaic is for.
by ste616
Tue Sep 08, 2015 1:23 pm
Forum: MIRIAD
Topic: Deleting calibration tables
Replies: 3
Views: 5167

Re: Deleting calibration tables

Hi Stuart,

These are the frequency-dependent gain and leakage tables, which are generated by gpcal if you specify nfbins to be anything higher than 1.

Yes, they should be mentioned in the section of the manual you identified - thanks for the suggestion!
by ste616
Tue May 19, 2015 3:15 pm
Forum: Calibration
Topic: General calibration recipe + nfbin questions
Replies: 3
Views: 11615

Re: General calibration recipe + nfbin questions

Hi Tim, My first question, in the case where 1934 is not only used for bandpass/flux density calibration but also phase, what is the best way to calibrate the data? Is there any need to break the data into two parts - one for the bandpass/flux density where there was 10 minutes of straight time on s...
by ste616
Tue May 19, 2015 9:04 am
Forum: Calibration
Topic: 1934 at 11GHz
Replies: 2
Views: 11560

Re: 1934 at 11GHz

Hi Tim, The feedhorn response above 11 GHz is pretty bad, and I've never been able to recover anything useful from the data that high in frequency, at least with CA01,2,4 and 6. CA03 and 5 have different feedhorns that do respond well to frequencies above 11 GHz. Unfortunately, it's hard to make a g...
by ste616
Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:08 pm
Forum: Calibration
Topic: 2 IFs , any advantage
Replies: 2
Views: 10325

Re: 2 IFs , any advantage

No, the data in the two IFs should be identical, save for some scaling and digital noise, which won't average away over more than a single cycle.
by ste616
Wed Mar 04, 2015 1:57 pm
Forum: Calibration
Topic: Phase jump on CA03
Replies: 1
Views: 11523

Re: Phase jump on CA03

Hi Andrew, This is the CA03 phase jump problem, and it has been around for quite some time, although it got much worse in the latter half of 2014. It was quite resistant to our efforts to fix it, although we think we finally found the problem mid-Feb 2015 and replaced the faulty parts. Anyway, the p...
by ste616
Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:55 am
Forum: CASA
Topic: Converting Miriad data into MeasurementSet form
Replies: 16
Views: 36597

Re: Converting Miriad data into MeasurementSet form

Hi Mickael,

It should be noted that uv2ms is only available in the 64 bit Linux version of Miriad. Are you using the 32 bit Linux version by any chance?