Search found 14 matches
- Fri May 19, 2017 9:29 pm
- Forum: MIRIAD
- Topic: Odd behaviour
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7002
Odd behaviour
Using uvindex, I see the frequency configuration change every 6th scan. Looking at the configurations reported by uvindex, the zoom frequencies are slightly different, but I'm unsure what could have caused this. Has it been reported before? 17MAY17:12:32:44.9 1045-62 c 6 39941 0 1 42121 17MAY17:12:3...
- Fri May 12, 2017 1:32 pm
- Forum: MIRIAD
- Topic: mfcal reading data slowly
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15939
Re: mfcal reading data slowly
Hi Mark,
Just saw this. I ran mirsync and indeed mfcal is much faster. Thanks for the fix.
Cheers
Stacy.
Just saw this. I ran mirsync and indeed mfcal is much faster. Thanks for the fix.
Cheers
Stacy.
- Sun Apr 23, 2017 3:04 pm
- Forum: MIRIAD
- Topic: mfcal reading data slowly
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15939
Re: mfcal reading data slowly
After ~ 30 minutes and using edge = 2000 and interval = 2, mfcal completed.
I used edge here as there is a ridiculous number of channels, not required
I used edge here as there is a ridiculous number of channels, not required
- Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:40 pm
- Forum: MIRIAD
- Topic: mfcal reading data slowly
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15939
Re: mfcal reading data slowly
Hi Jamie,
Doesn't seem to make a difference. Looking at the activity monitor the bytes in/out is 0, even after 2 minutes.
Doesn't seem to make a difference. Looking at the activity monitor the bytes in/out is 0, even after 2 minutes.
- Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:30 pm
- Forum: MIRIAD
- Topic: mfcal reading data slowly
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15939
Re: mfcal reading data slowly
Hi Jamie, Only stokes=ii and interval=[0.1|10] I have copied the file to kaputar:/data/KAPUTAR_1/mad134/1921-293.22237.7.tar.bz2 The data was taken using 1M0.5k, with 16k channels (I just concatennated all zooms). I should note everything was fine the other day, but today, I'm running into this prob...
- Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:18 pm
- Forum: MIRIAD
- Topic: mfcal reading data slowly
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15939
Re: mfcal reading data slowly
I'm seeing the same kind of thing with mfcal running 100% CPU, processing 1921-293 from last month. Upon finding this post, I did a mirsync and the version I currently have is: MfCal: $Revision: 1.18 $, $Date: 2017/03/06 03:50:09 $ It doesn't seem to matter whether I set interval to 0.1 or 10 minute...
- Thu Oct 08, 2015 9:54 am
- Forum: Online Programs
- Topic: COORD
- Replies: 2
- Views: 41624
Re: COORD
The COORD script has been re-written using PyEphem. Hopefully past bugs/issues have been addressed.
- Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:35 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: Positional error in restored image
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9316
Re: Positional error in restored image
imfit: Revision 1.11, 2013/08/30 01:49:21 UTC ------------------------------------------------- Object 1933-400_3cm RMS residual is 1.22E-02 (theoretical image noise is 1.24E-04) Using the following beam parameters when deconvolving and converting to integrated flux Beam Major, minor axes (arcsec): ...
- Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:25 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: Positional error in restored image
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9316
Re: Positional error in restored image
Just understood your meaning. I'll look at the position.
- Fri Dec 13, 2013 11:54 am
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: Positional error in restored image
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9316
Re: Positional error in restored image
Hi Jamie,
There is only 7.5 degrees between source and phase calibrator 1933-400... In processing all the L, C and X data, the same effect is seen. Odd.
There is only 7.5 degrees between source and phase calibrator 1933-400... In processing all the L, C and X data, the same effect is seen. Odd.