Search found 45 matches
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 6:22 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: CLEAN iterations
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9577
Re: CLEAN iterations
Hi Mark, Just going back to my fainter sources (~2 sigma detection), when I set the cutoff to 5*rms in clean no iterations are completed because the cutoff is already reached. Is this an issue at all? I've tried adding the second clean i.e. cutoff=5*rms,rms but this seems to not iterate at all. Chee...
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:24 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: IMFIT vs UVFIT
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13606
Re: IMFIT vs UVFIT
Thanks heaps!
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:22 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: CLEAN iterations
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9577
Re: CLEAN iterations
Thanks mark, this has significantly help in my imaging process.
Here's my image now, looking much better.
Here's my image now, looking much better.
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 4:24 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: IMFIT vs UVFIT
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13606
Re: IMFIT vs UVFIT
Hi Mark,
Thanks again,
From my understanding the beam size changes in relation to the weighting, is there a way to determine its size previous to invert for its input into the invert task?
Cheers,
Brodie
Thanks again,
From my understanding the beam size changes in relation to the weighting, is there a way to determine its size previous to invert for its input into the invert task?
Cheers,
Brodie
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 3:50 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: IMFIT vs UVFIT
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13606
Re: IMFIT vs UVFIT
Hi Mark, Thanks for the reply, I thought the best way to measure a flux was to use natural weighting? If I use the robust parameter any where between -2 and 2 miriad prints I'm using a uniform weighting, and I either get an image with stripe bands for closer to negative robust values or a lower sign...
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 2:44 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: CLEAN iterations
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9577
Re: CLEAN iterations
Hi Mark, I'm a little more confused now. So on the principle that it's appropriate to clean a source until the min,max,rms values start to rise I re-cleaned some of my brighter targets. Attached are two images (natural weighting), the first is for niters=1000 (what I use to always use as a default) ...
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 11:50 am
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: IMFIT vs UVFIT
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13606
Re: IMFIT vs UVFIT
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the reply, I've attached said image.
In regards to making a lower resolution image, what does that mean exactly?
Cheers,
Brodie
Thanks for the reply, I've attached said image.
In regards to making a lower resolution image, what does that mean exactly?
Cheers,
Brodie
- Mon Aug 05, 2019 11:34 am
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: CLEAN iterations
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9577
Re: CLEAN iterations
Thanks for the reply!
- Fri Aug 02, 2019 5:47 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: CGDISP contours
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5512
Re: CGDISP contours
Apologies I somehow had incorrectly inputted the levs1 desired contours, this issue is now solved
- Fri Aug 02, 2019 5:46 pm
- Forum: Imaging
- Topic: IMFIT vs UVFIT
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13606
IMFIT vs UVFIT
Hi again, I'm trying to determine the integrated flux of my source. Using: imfit in=imagefile region=arcsec,box(-8,-8,8,8) object=gaussian Produces an integrated flux: 3.5969E-05 +/- 1.8854E-05 Where, using: uvfit vis=visfile object=gaussian Produces an integrated flux: 6.0837E-05 +/- 3.23E-05 Now I...